BNs.537. In The Emperor's New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds and the Laws of Physics by Roger Penrose (Oxford 1989), the distinguished mathematician and physicist promoted the idea that Goedel's incompleteness theorem proves that human cognition -- or intuition -- must entail more than computation, and urged that quantum effects in the brain could provide a physical explanation. No AI system could intuit the way humans do, he argued. In a followup book, Shadows of the Mind -- A Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness (Oxford 1994), Penrose went to great lengths to rebut reader arguments that Goedel's theorem is false or that it did not apply.
Though I was, for technical reasons, not fully persuaded by Penrose's reasoning, it is quiet evident Alfred Tarski's "undefinability of truth" theorem is relevant to the AI "consciousness" controversy and gives at least some support to Penrose's views.
Some Ryle essay footnotes appear on this site, which is devoted to life after physics.
There is no claim of expertise with respect to the musings on this page. Never use my stuff for homework!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
A short proof of the Jordan curve theorem
The following is a proposed proof. Topology's Jordan curve theorem, first proposed in 1887 by Camille Jordan, asserts that an...
-
NOTE. Occasionally, over the years, I have published discussions of the binary tree picture of the reals. This post continues in that ve...
-
I can't remember many of the details of the following post from 2007. But I can visualize what I meant, which is that if the reals are m...
-
Though out of step with the intellectual legions of the era, Bertrand Russell's 1910 essay, The Elements of Ethics, was prescient in...
No comments:
Post a Comment